Inventorship
An invention is only as good as the disclosure (data and description)
upon which it is based. Disclosure planning and preparation are
among our fortes. If you need assistance we can help. We have
some four decades of experience in developing the technical sides
of inventions and reducing them to practice. This "engineering" is
best done before a disclosure is written. We can provide assistance
with experimental design, concept development, reducing inventions
to practice or a prototype and writing disclosures. A disclosure
is a formal document that provides the basis upon which a patent
application is drafted. At that point, your idea is ready for
submission to your patent attorney, or agent, as you may wish.
Alternatively, we have associates who are patent attorneys.
Once again: An invention is only as good as the disclosure (data
and description) upon which it is based.
In like manner, your application will be only as good as your understanding
of just what it is that you have invented. This is especially true
of utility patents where there are several types that can be obtained
from a single application (the only immediate cost is the fee attending
the division). For example a disclosure may provide bases for claiming
a method for making something (method), that something (apparatus)
and the composition of that something. Unless every possible angle
is covered, the new inventor risks losing key coverage and in any
event does not have the breadth of coverage otherwise possible. If
you claim too much, there is no penalty. Such claims are simply not
allowed. Some regard it as a matter of pride that a patent is issued
without any objections. We take a different view. If we do not get
any rejections we look hard for claims we might have missed and we
also do an additional search for prior art that we all might have
missed. Only after those two follow up procedures do we feel comfortable
allowing the patent to issue. A patent that can be challenged may
end up worth little or nothing.
If you have a great idea but have never filed for a patent, you
may wish to visit Basic Facts about Inventions for a primer before
proceeding. You may also wish to visit Entrepreneurship and Creativity.
You can also browse Inventor Help online for Pressman's classic "Patent
It Yourself". This book is best used in preparing you, the inventor,
to communicate with your patent attorney or agent in writing your
application.
If you have an idea, and have not already done so, protecting your
intellectual property should be your first order of business. Any
such description should be as complete as you can make it. Your preferred
method, structure or product should be clearly explained and pointed
out. Explain how your invention is useful and novel over prior art.
Also make sure to list each inventor. Inventorship is best determined
by an attorney, but a working rule is: name any and all who contributed
an enabling idea to one or more claims. A typical patent application
will contain:
1) title, list of inventors and abstract,
2) background with references
to all known prior art,
3) brief description,
4) detailed description with examples, drawings
and data,
5) a statement of preferred practice (best mode if there is one)
and
6) claims.
There are various types of patents and overlapping is frequent.
Wording is important. Competent patent counsel is suggested for such
determinations. For further information you may visit U.S. Patent
and Trade Mark Office or seek the advice of a competent patent attorney
or agent. For further information and research try: PTO Sites.
Now for "...ship" part of Inventorship
Inventorship is as much art as science or business. It certainly
involves more than just curiosity and resourcefulness. To be a successful
entrepreneur also requires a temperament fit for that task in addition
to the basic business skills.
Are you well suited for what you want to do? What follows is intended
to help you find out for yourself.
What motivates you?
What motivates just about everyone?
What is creativity?
How do you handle ideas suggested by another?
Do you use inductive reasoning? Deductive reasoning? Which do you
prefer?
Are you curious?
Do you like to try out wild guesses?
Are you creative? How do you know?
Describe something creative you have done that you are proud of.
What
is creativity, basically?
Are groups more creative than individuals?
Why or why not?
What is the difference between creativity and resourcefulness?
When
are your most creative moments?
Is your workplace
Always neat?
Order within Disorder?
Total Chaos?
Does it matter?
How do you follow up on ideas presented by
A colleague?
Your boss?
Your spouse or sibling?
By a friend?
How energetic are you?
Would you like to get rich?
If so, why?
What is generally meant by "brain-storming"?
What do you mean by that term?
Does brain-storming work?
Do you prefer inductive thinking over deductive thinking? Why?
What
makes team-work work?
Are most people team players?
If you could retire, what would you
do with the rest of your life?
Are most people inventive?
Are most people curious?
Who is your role-model inventor?
Who is your role-model scientist?
Have you studied that person's life?
Who is your role-model entrepreneur?
Discuss.
What is the content of your casual reading?
Can most people be trusted?If not, why not?
Are two heads really better
than one?
Discuss your answer.
If you could boil the word creativity down to
one or two sentences, what would it (they) be?
What traits set inventors apart from he rest of us?
What traits do most inventors share?
The above is self-scoring; you are your own judge.
Do you measure up to your own standards?
For a similar review see
Entrepreneurship.
Notes:
Inventorship is, of course, more complex than a response to environment—or
a questionnaire. In part the skill is in our genes, in part it is
shaped by our learning experiences and yes, it is in part situational.
Most great inventions happened in response to obvious or not so obvious
needs (situations). Edison is a prime example of the lifelong-prolific
type. Tesla, to contrast a contemporary, offered a brilliant and
winning alternative to one of Edison's most basic inventions. Tesla
won one technology battle, yet Edison won the lifelong war—who
remembers Tesla? Ironically, Tesla realized virtually nothing from
his invention of three phase power generation, conversion and distribution
while Edison became rich and famous from his many other inventions.
Tesla also held numerous other patents, but could not realize enough
from any to even live on or be remembered by. Patrons kept him alive.
It seems the real race is not always to the swift but to those who
keep on running. So also, rewards come not just from brilliance,
a la Tesla, but from careful persistence in the manner of Edison.
Edison concentrated on the business of invention; Tesla, ever the
brilliant dramatist, failed to round the bases after the only real
home run he ever hit. Tesla surely left the world better than he
found it, but at great cost to himself as well as to his benefactors.
Nevertheless, Tesla was a great physicist as well as inventor. Edison
and Tesla illustrate vividly what a difference temperament can make.
We know similar experiences first hand.
Integrity also plays a role in the advancement of knowledge. Students
beginning their study of calculus soon encounter L'Hospital's Rule,
after the Marquis de L'Hospital who published a method for evaluating
expressions of the type 0/0. Thereby the Marquis became part of the
history of mathematics. However the discovery was not his, but that
of Johann Bernoulli. The Marquis it seems had money and used it to
become the patron of poor Johann who did not. The Marquis, wanting
to be famous, struck a Devil's bargain with the unsuspecting Bernoulli—"Give
me exclusive use of your solutions to problems I give and I will
support you." The Marquis did indeed become famous, to Johann's
surprise and at his expense. It is easy to imagine what happened
to their relationship. Experiences such as this too, are in our background.
These vignettes (and a variety of others) are replayed daily in
our times. The moral directives we draw are simple. We will stay
the course only with those for whom ethical team play is natural
to their modus operendi. In mutual integrity enduring relationships
maintain. To avoid the modern Marquis, we are selective in searching
out those with integrity who will stay the course and pay attention
to the real business at hand.
While we are open to any and all ideas and individuals, we reserve
the right to select those whom we will support, hire or associate
or collaborate with. Resonance in core values and management philosophy
are necessary. Staying power will also be important. A spirit of
team work with common values and goals ensure lasting relationships.
But we will not stay with a "bad marriage", should one
occur. That will be "boiler plate" up front.
We look not for the self-serving whose primary goal is to get rich
and/or powerful at the expense of all else, but for those for whom
ethical team play is in their spirit and who will stay the course.
We are results oriented. We hope you are too.
I f you think you have an idea worth patenting, see: Provisional
Patent.
Notice: Nothing on this page or any other page of this site is to
be construed as legal advice. Our intent is to illustrate how we
proceed and what we expect. For example, we expect you to obtain
competent legal advise BEFORE dealing with us. Thanks in advance.
> back to top